🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the Britain, and it seems it’s time for a re-evaluation. Throughout its history, an event that began as a festivity and recollection of history, culture and the connections between global Black communities, has adopted a commercial tone, growing to encompass events where Black people are remunerated to speak with Caucasian groups about implicit prejudice and active solidarity. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade generated a rise in the enterprise of demonstrating racial awareness. However, that period has concluded. The tide has reached its height, producing a diluted aftermath of what raising awareness is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

Initially celebrated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with seven days of remembrance and recognition in the middle of February. Black History Month developed from this campaign and was officially launched in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the North America in February, but also in October in the Britain, Deutschland, Éire and the Holland.

The observance has transformed since those days, giving reduced attention to the narratives of colonial slavery and struggles for equality, and increasingly on prominent Black figures in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and broadly celebrating the contribution Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the method the observance is celebrated is a indication of the current political situation. How it evolves is a good lesson in how co-option leads to dismantling: the reshaping of Black History Month has stymied the purpose of it, which is to tackle systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Jarring Moment

Little demonstrates how important it is to reconsider Black History Month better than the specific period in which it falls this year. In the United Kingdom, a reemerging right-wing in the form of the Reform organization is ahead in surveys. In the warmer months we saw the biggest extreme right demonstration in the history of Britain. a prominent political figure, the person of color at the helm of the Conservative party, is a strong critic of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a situation where a member of parliament gains confidence to say that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a source of worry. Simultaneously, ultra-nationalist movements are surging in Europe as a whole.

In the United States, a significant offensive against DEI and affirmative action has been carried, often successfully, to the supreme judicial bodies of the state. A effort to erase the history of people of color and experience from the historical documents is under way. One of the former president's first executive orders focused on the museum of African American legacy, and the prestigious establishment, alleging that they of a organized and extensive campaign to rewrite our Nation’s history” by representing the nation “as naturally discriminatory”.

Against this backdrop, the month symbolises how minimally it can be impactful if it is limited to either obligatory business commemorations, or politically neutered celebrations of contributions in the past, rather than challenging the situation of the contemporary world. It also demonstrates how its short period means that it is detached from the wider consistent effort that is needed. Denise Miller, a prof at University of Greenwich, put it best when she voiced worries about the temporary “tokenism” of the observance. “The difficulty with embracing a superficial method”, she stated, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a transient display rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Establishing how to alter, change and broaden efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such times of discouragement and concern is a difficult task. There is a temptation to just discontinue events including Black History Month altogether, assuming they are inadequate for current needs, or are vestiges of an time that has failed to deliver.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and legacy of racial movements – community-based BLM initiatives, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and indeed, including corporate presentations – constitute an framework that a lot of work has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, regresses), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month look like? Well, first, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is distributed throughout the annual calendar (as various establishments are already commencing), parts of its content (particularly around historic Black characters) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a era that does not avoid politics, and leaves space for citizens, particularly young people, to share their anxieties and narratives. What use is mere awareness of the bygone era when it doesn’t reckon with the current situation of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the urban areas? Institutions who celebrate it should not be reassured with the neutral terminology of hidden discrimination and awareness of “microaggressions”, but confronted with the risks that affect everyone if opposition to discrimination is not taken seriously. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made contemporary, pressing, and adaptive. It could be that an total re-identification is necessary – Black History is Now Month.